tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3484609757410640474.post7372624929840241440..comments2023-05-30T16:12:07.360+03:00Comments on On Winning: How to measure decision making?Panu Kinnarihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09719368896364978634noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3484609757410640474.post-15746161949295942252008-12-15T08:40:00.000+02:002008-12-15T08:40:00.000+02:00That might be so. One purpose of this blog, at lea...That might be so. One purpose of this blog, at least for me as a non-native English speaker is to give venue where I can write in English, in order to improve my writing skills.Panu Kinnarihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09719368896364978634noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3484609757410640474.post-73300910539219836272008-12-03T01:33:00.000+02:002008-12-03T01:33:00.000+02:00you need some writing lessonsyou need some writing lessonsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3484609757410640474.post-18343685367674600872008-09-14T19:27:00.000+03:002008-09-14T19:27:00.000+03:00It probably depends a lot of the nature of the pro...It probably depends a lot of the nature of the problem. It should also be considered that action might be wrong and what would that mean. If your wrong action derails you badly, you might not have enough time to recover until it's too late. Sometimes your wrong action is not that big deal and trying out is the fastest and most efficient way to find a solution. Adapting through action is solving problems by trial and error without understanding. Sometimes it works, sometimes not. The important thing is to understand the situation.<BR/><BR/>In my opinion people use trial and error approach too much. They fight the same problems all the time without finding a way out because they don't care to seek understanding. Then again, that might be the best way to deal with everyday problems because it's so common. I don't know. I prefer understanding, propably because of my personality.<BR/><BR/>I think that people who lead nations and big corporations shouldn't just do something and see what happens but know what they are doing or at least try. What we are doing right here is seeking understanding which is a way to predict future on a small scale.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3484609757410640474.post-66662150573396686562008-03-07T09:41:00.000+02:002008-03-07T09:41:00.000+02:00Is is really? What if everyone else is focused on ...Is is really? What if everyone else is focused on predicting and you are focused on acting faster? Who wins when prediction goes wrong?<BR/><BR/>In my opinion action is infinitely better than prediction. Trying to predict better just justifies not touching your sub-bar processes, which deliver the value.Panu Kinnarihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09719368896364978634noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3484609757410640474.post-46668168330231516532008-03-07T00:11:00.000+02:002008-03-07T00:11:00.000+02:00I think predicting is one crucial part of fast rea...I think predicting is one crucial part of fast reaction. You might not know exactly what is coming but you can have a hunch of the nature of the change and prepare accordingly. One aspect of orientation (as in OODA-loop) is understanding what you see and realizing its consequences. When things start to change completely unpredictably you are usually the one who is behind in the loop.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com